bederman_manliness_civilization
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| bederman_manliness_civilization [2026/03/17 21:35] – [Chapter 4: "Not to Sex-But to Race!" Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Civilized Anglo-Saxon Womanhood, and the Return of the Primitive Rapist] ccochra2 | bederman_manliness_civilization [2026/03/20 23:46] (current) – [Chapter 5: Theodore Roosevelt: Manhood, Nation, and "Civilization"] jjardine | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
| In the time of Charlotte Perkins Gilman, women were painted as less able to lead civilization. Gilmas argued that civilization was not a question of gender difference, but of racce difference. She wanted to make white women central to civilization' | In the time of Charlotte Perkins Gilman, women were painted as less able to lead civilization. Gilmas argued that civilization was not a question of gender difference, but of racce difference. She wanted to make white women central to civilization' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Charlotte Gilman argued that to be a woman was to make a civilized home for her husband and children and to be an anglo-saxon was to be an intellectual and further the white race to a perfect civilization. She wanted women to be equal because women helped bring civilization to men and forcing women to stay at home and not be intellectual with men held white society as a whole back. Civilized advancement was as much a man's concern as it was a woman' | ||
| + | |||
| + | While Gilman argued that women were inferior to men because they were evolved to be that way due to being over-sexed by men, she also said that in order to avoid race decay, women needed to be able to evolve back into being as civilized as men. She also argued that women were superior and men were the ones created to be sexed but she said that men's desire for dominance and the primitive rapist was what was holding civilization back both ways. Unfortunately for her thanks to Teddy Roosevelt the primal rapist, violent, egotistical man was seen as a positive thing and what masculinity should be and important to white civilization. Even though she contradicted herself and shifted her arguments to combat the shifting arguments of anti-feminists, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Charlotte Perkins Gilman believed that women' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Charlotte Perkins Gilman, a scientist of the early 20th century, used the discourse of civilization to help create feminist arguments. The discourse of the time portrays women as being inferior to men in terms of the civilization of men, citing how primitive matriarchal societies were far behind the white patriarchal nations. While not explicitly invoking white supremacist language, Gilman often aligned herself along a similar axis. Gilman said that the language of civilization was more understandable and usable for those of the white race. (Tanner Gillikin) | ||
| ===== Chapter 5: Theodore Roosevelt: Manhood, Nation, and " | ===== Chapter 5: Theodore Roosevelt: Manhood, Nation, and " | ||
| Line 74: | Line 82: | ||
| G. Bederman’s study situates T. Roosevelt’s trip to Africa within the broader discourses of race and masculinity. In particular, G. Bederman argues that this trip functioned both as a performance of masculinity through exposure to danger (hunting, fighting, surviving) and as a reinforcement of his views on race and civilization. T. Roosevelt considered Africa to be in a stage comparable to the Stone Age or the Pleistocene, | G. Bederman’s study situates T. Roosevelt’s trip to Africa within the broader discourses of race and masculinity. In particular, G. Bederman argues that this trip functioned both as a performance of masculinity through exposure to danger (hunting, fighting, surviving) and as a reinforcement of his views on race and civilization. T. Roosevelt considered Africa to be in a stage comparable to the Stone Age or the Pleistocene, | ||
| + | |||
| + | In Bederman' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Bederman shows how Theodore Roosevelt was able to build his claim to political power on his claim to manhood, but also in terms of nationalism and civilization. Roosevelt beilived in building a race of white American values. He promoted his idea of "The white man's burden", | ||
| GOT TO HERE --WBM | GOT TO HERE --WBM | ||
| + | In his ideas of race, gender, and civilization, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Theodore Roosevelt believed that black people were the most primitive of all races, and that their presence in the US was a grave historical error that could not be reversed. While he was strongly against lynching, he still excused its reasons to some extent, believing that racial violence was just an inevitable consequence of white and black people living in such close proximity. He argued that the solution to racial inequality was to simply let " | ||
| + | |||
| + | Theodore Roosevelt believed in the idea of the “strenuous life,” which held that men needed to engage in physical activity and use their strength to resist idleness. By giving in to sloth, Roosevelt proposes that men lend themselves to overcivilization and the degradation of their race. This is why Roosevelt was an ardent supporter of the Spanish-American War (and any war generally). Going to war, it allowed men to act on a small portion of their savage energy in a controlled environment and maintain their strength and intelligent civilization. (Tanner Gillikin) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The early 20th century saw a rise in fears of race suicide, the idea that a “civilized” race tends to have decelerated birth rates and accelerated death rates. This alarmist theory, similar to those of neurasthenia, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Bederman introduces Theodore Roosevelt as an individual that civilization used to see as " | ||
bederman_manliness_civilization.1773783355.txt.gz · Last modified: by ccochra2
