Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- gilfoyle_city_of_eros [2026/02/13 02:01] – 76.78.172.12
+++ gilfoyle_city_of_eros [2026/02/13 16:18] (current) – [Masculinity, “Spree” Violence, and the Law] 199.111.65.11
@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 This article describes how female prostitutes used the law to its fullest extent when prosecuting these men. I think this also highlights Gilfoyle's claims about the widening gap between these women who made a lot of money and where in a lot of instances public figures, vs the men who in most cases were working class men who had been excludes from these businesses on that basis. (Hannah Covin)
+Prostitutes in New York at this time also lived in brothers that were not invisible to the public eye. They brought in a certain type of clientele that were of higher statuses and the women were able to amass large amounts of wealth within their work. Even though prostitution was technically not illegal, prostitutes were not prosecuted for selling sex. Sex work was integrated into every day life and masculinity in the context of this reading turns to almost "buying" power and dominance over the sex workers, in compliance with the prostitutes earning larger amounts of money and also not being prosecuted. (Tea Aliu)
 Attacks against brothels in the early nineteenth century had an undeniable class aspect. The brothels were places where prostitutes plied their trade to an upper-class and exclusive clientele of merchants and clerks, and therefore were unattainable spaces for working-class New Yorkers. These New Yorkers vented their rage at the changing economics of the city, that increasingly privileged the mercantile class over the artisanal and laboring classes, by attacking brothels and the "loose" women within them, who they thought should be "available" to the entire community, not just the upper classes. Many men who engaged in these "sprees" would later engage in Nativist violence against immigrants, who were also seen as threatening the economic security of working-class, White Protestants. (Nick Thodal)
@@ Line 21: / Line 23: @@
 Spree violence seems to be another form of homosical communication between these men. They are public spectacles and all the men involved wanted to get in on some of the violence, fueled by alcohol, and gain approval from their peers by committing these acts of violence. Men are also just ruminating on these thoughts since the violence against person or property are pre-planned. The violence may have stemmed from disproval of prostitution as Gilfoyle suggests, but it was also a way for men to assert their virility over their counterparts. (Tea Aliu)
+"The gangs led by Hyer, Chichester, and others played critical roles in the distribution of power and the early formation of the antebellum political machine."(page 87) Men are able to gain mobility by committing acts of violence or oppression between certain brothels, so this aggression can then be understood to be an organization of male power over sex workers since sex work becomes culturally embedded into society during this time. As prostitution became more and more popular and earning more money, they're paying men to give them protection. And taking them to court after the destruction of their property while a prostitutes "impropriety" gets the blind eye in the court setting. (Tea Aliu)
+The spree violence that the men are committing in this era are sadistic in nature and spurred into fervor of aggression towards these women through the alcohol consumption and fanatic rantings of other men in their social groups. The obsession these men had to gain respect, power, or a raise in class status, created this illusion of taking power and imposing their higher status over women was to use violence and try to secure their role in the masculinity of the era. (Sage Milton)
 ===== Alcohol, Commercialized Sex, and the Reshaping of Masculinity =====