User Tools

Site Tools


kimmel_manhood_in_america

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
kimmel_manhood_in_america [2026/03/27 16:22] willmackkimmel_manhood_in_america [2026/04/02 17:08] (current) – [Architypes of Manhood] rgibson
Line 35: Line 35:
  
 In this section, Kimmel also makes the instability of the Male Archetypes specifically with how the self-made man can be revoked due to a lack of self-control or a severe mistake. Showing that the stability in the archetypes can be seen through the support behind the men; the guild for artisan heroes, the wealth and pre-established status for the genteel patriarch, and the connections from the self-made man. -(sage milton) In this section, Kimmel also makes the instability of the Male Archetypes specifically with how the self-made man can be revoked due to a lack of self-control or a severe mistake. Showing that the stability in the archetypes can be seen through the support behind the men; the guild for artisan heroes, the wealth and pre-established status for the genteel patriarch, and the connections from the self-made man. -(sage milton)
 +
 +In this chapter, Kimmel argues how the transformation of masculinity is due to both urbanization and industrialization. He argues that men during this period experienced a shift from being self-made producers to laborers, dependent on their boss, uppers, and wages. This shift caused a manhood crisis that festered through the sudden loss of autonomy, authority, and identity. Work became a way to convey success and dominance, instead of means for self-mobility. This shift was heavily influenced by immigration, where black men and women entered the workforce and increased the stress of competition, which threatened the authority of white individuals during this time. Because of this, men cultivated hierarchies which promoted exclusion though characteristics of sexism and racism. This behavior was justified though Dawinistic ideology and aided in the shift of masculinity being less defined by who men were, but what they could prove. (Reiley Gibson)
 +
 +In this chapter, Kimmel conveys how “work” as a role of masculine identity has been lost or shifted, which prompts new constructions of manhood. This new construction of manhood involves behaviors and fears of a feminized identity. This fear of feminization and homosexuality highlights how manhood, now, must be constantly performed and reinforced. This prompted men to showcase their masculinity through outlets like sports and drinking (depending on class and societal perception). While these new endeavors seem “manly” men in this shift also valued sexual discipline and the restraint of emotions. This shift really highlights how masculinity became both means of expressing manhood through both an internal and societal lens. (Reiley Gibson)
 +
 +
 ==== Economic Success and Manhood ==== ==== Economic Success and Manhood ====
  
kimmel_manhood_in_america.txt · Last modified: by rgibson