This is an old revision of the document!
The naming of the Civil War has a history that dates back to even before the war started. In 1860 and 1861 before fighting started, parties on both sides called what was to come a Civil War, however once fighting broke out, less concrete names were used. Lincoln himself started the war by calling the Confederacy an insurrection, but then moved more towards rebellion as a means to further discredit the actions of the Confederacy. - Ewan H
Some of the most popular names the Confederates used during the war involved mentions of enslaved people like the Abolition War and Republican War as a means of getting more Southerners mad enough to fight. These naming conventions were adopted by abolitionists in the North, however, and used as a way to try and push for the war being about slavery. Of these names that mention slavery, the Slaveholders’ Rebellion was the most popular, but this name did not reach ubiquitous use due to the attempts at reunion and lingering racial politics. - Ewan H
After the Confederacy was defeated, they attempted to save face through the naming conventions of the war (to some extent). Names like The War between the States and the War of the Confederates were being pushed by Southern histories directly after the war. The Southerners rejected the notion that there was any rebellion or insurrection, and that the Confederacy fought nobly for their views, as outlined in the Lost Cause. - Ewan H
From the beginning of the war, rebellion appeared to be the most common name used in the North and by Abraham Lincoln. This name, however, supports the Union's perspective of the war, which is that the South rebelled against them and tried to overthrow their form of government. This places most of the blame on the South. However, calling the war a “civil war” is more objective and allows both sides to define the war as they wanted and not place blame on either side, making it the most publicly used name. -Emily B
Something I found interesting was Abraham Lincoln first used the word “insurrection” but then used the term “rebellion” in his messages. Lincoln's use of the word “rebellion” rather than “insurrection” shows how carefully he defined the Civil War. He thought it was better suited for the North's perspective on the fight and how the South was to blame for this fight. (Hannah E.)
Unfortunately, white Northerners didn't catch on to “Slaveholders' Rebellion” and “Abolition War”, despite the fact that those names accurately reflect one of the reasons behind the Civil War. White Northerners only recalled the war as a struggle to abolish slavery and defend the Union. However, it's very obvious that their commitment was to preserving the Union rather than abolishing slavery. Many people, including Lincoln, I believe, were reluctant to accept the war as a struggle for emancipation. (Hannah E.)
Lincoln's use of the term “insurrection” in the beginning of the war was carefully calculated. He used it in order to justify using military force against the Confederacy, as allowed by a law following the Whiskey Rebellion that let presidents quell civil unrest. He also used it to remove legitimacy from the Confederacy, because if he called it a civil war, it would make the Confederacy out to be an actual belligerent in a conflict instead of just a rebellious faction. (Ezra C.)
One thing that stuck out to me was the initial discussion over the usage of the word “rebellion” in legal language like the Constitution, and how some people after the fact saw that as a reason to use the word as the official name for the war. Others saw that as something of the past, a reaction to the time period, and did not think the word rebellion applied to the war anymore. The specific discussion between the title Rebellion and Civil War was particularly interesting as well, in particular how leaders of the time period used it (Lincoln using rebellion, Jefferson Davis using Civil War). - Caty
During the war Abraham Lincoln used the term “rebellion” most often when referring to what we now call the Civil War. This phrasing is deliberately used to make the confederate cause seem illegitimate. The conflict was not seen as a battle of nations, but a small section of the nation striking out against the greater portion of the country. This scheme highlights Lincoln's highest priority: keeping the war together, and not ending slavery. (Tanner Gillikin)
In the south, people often referred to the war using neutral terms in the immediate aftermath of the war, most commonly “The War Between the States”. However, in the early twentieth century, this would shift with the rise of the lost cause narrative. This would popularize names like “The War of Northern Aggression”. This would help in the attempts to shift the narrative around the war from being one about differing ideology of the two sides, to a tyrannical act of the North. (Tanner Gillikin)
For many African Americans, especially Frederick Douglass, they wanted to focus the name of the war on the issue of slavery. They would have called it “The Abolition War” or “The War of Emancipation”. These names would highlight the abject horror of slavery, and how it was the utmost important cause in why the Confederacy attempted to succeed. That is notably different from the more neutral names like “Civil War” which effectively glosses over the issue of slavery. (Tanner Gillikin)
It is incredibly interesting how the leaders of America at the time sought to emphasize the countries unity despite the existing internal conflict. It was important to present a united front and a strong nation despite the “civil war.” Early on no mentions were mad eof civil war but focus was placed on it being an uprising or revolution. -Declan F.
The term rebellion allowed for Americans to gloss over the major reason for the war, a conflict over slavery. The politics of the war were more relevant to its beginnings yet we see focus placed on insurrection rather than whether or not slavery should be legal. Declan F.
It's amazing how a name can change the meaning of a war. This constant decision on what the war should be called and the way the name actively changes until “Civil War” was eventually decided on is really intriguing. Both the South and the North came up with different names to identify the conflict that was going on. Some common terms in the North were “Rebellion, Slaveholderrs' Rebellion, and Abolition War”, while the South had “Confederate War, War of Northern Aggression, and Late Unpleasantness”. Both sides focused on names that pitted blame on the other end, fueling this idea that one side was the cause of all this violence while the other was fighting for justice. The name “Civil War” gave both sides a leeway to both give and take responsibility for war that had taken place. (Lexi St. John)
During and after the Civil War, many African Americans were surveyed about what they called the war. While most of them named it the “Civil War,” Foster explains that some African Americans used names that cited slavery as one of the causes of the Civil War. Some of these names included, “Slavery War,” “Freedom War,” and “the War for Freedom.” - Lauren V.
Foster explains that the use of the name, “War between the States” became immensely popular during the 1950s and 60s with white southerners as racial and governmental tensions rose with the rise of civil rights movements. Foster explains that this name was used by white southerners to cite that states rights were the primary cause of the Civil War. - Lauren V.
Another name used by white southerners and white supremacists was, “The War of Northern Aggression.” Foster explains that this name was used in direct responses to southerners being displeased with the racial change that civil rights movements were causing. - Lauren V.
It is fascinating that the ultimate goal of using “Civil War” is to enable either side to pick their perceived cause of the war. At the end of the reading, Foster also mentioned “mutual innocence.” It is an interesting way to describe remaining attitudes surrounding the Civil War. Is there a way that describing combatants in a war as having mutual innocence could be moral? -Sarah M.
Foster’s article highlights the development of the label for the American Civil War. Interestingly, northerners and southerners had their own names for the conflict that either blamed the other side or tried to reach justification for the violence. For example, Foster explains that the name “The War between the States”, proposed by white Southerners, implies that the Civil War was constitutionally legal and avoid the term “Rebellion.” Eventually, “Civil War” was the name that was adopted for the conflict because it is a neutral term that afforded no accountability or justification. - Ian Tiblin
Lincoln deliberately called the war a “rebellion” when it came to putting down southern legitimacy. He then switched to civil war in speeches where he was trying to invoke reconciliation. Lincoln was using different names to invoke different connotations to the war. (Guy)
-The term “abolition war” was actually used by White Southerners to rally the south to their cause, knowing that Whites would be mobilized by the threat on slavery. It was also used by Northern peace Democrats to criticize the American government for making the war too much about slavery (421). Abolitionists like Frederick Douglas used the term abolition war to reaffirm what the war was really about (slavery). He saw the abolition of slavery as the only way to preserve the union and the constitution (422). -Sophia Prewitt
-The “War Between the States” became a very popular term after it appeared in a former confederate book. The term was popular because it stood on the idea that America was never one whole body, and that it was regularly divided between a Northern and Southern Republic, therefore it was a war between these two long standing American Republics (It also emphasized State Rights) (425).-Sophia Prewitt
-There were a few times, namely in 1907 and 1911, where the name for the war was brought before congress. In both instances, Southerners objected to terms like “Rebellion” and instead wanted the term “The Civil War.” In actuality, Southerners preferred terms like “War Between the States,” but recognized the controversy, so settled for Civil War. Also missing from these debates were any mentions of slavery, which likely had to do with the early 20th century rise of radical white racism (434).- Sophia Prewitt
During the early stages of the Civil War, Lincoln repeatedly flipped between names. The two most consistent names he would use early on were “Rebellion” and “Insurrection”. There are many legal implications to the language Lincoln used. The most notable being the suspension of Habeas Corpus. (Hank L)
Later in the War, the different names of the Civil War were looked at more closely. One of the main reasons for this was because Lincoln wanted to reunite the North and South. By calling it the “Civil War”, there are less political implications. Unification would have been much more difficult had the Union continued to call the war an “insurrection” or “rebellion”. (Hank L)
By calling the Civil War the “Civil War”, there can be many interpretations for its causes. For example, Southerners may say that the war was for States’ rights; while many Northerns would say that the South wanted to preserve slavery. This generic name allowed for everyone to see their respective causes as right. (Hank L)