| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision |
| johansen_family_men [2026/02/13 16:14] – khamilt3 | johansen_family_men [2026/02/13 16:51] (current) – khamilt3 |
|---|
| |
| To be a father and husband was to be a man, to be a father and husband was to be a breadwinner, and to be a breadwinner was to be a man. All of these identities were intertwined and so if a man lost his job he was not only no longer a breadwinner, but also no longer a successful father, husband, or man, he lost everything. On the other hand, the importance placed on breadwinning contributed to consumerism as the better your house, furniture, and other possessions, the more successful you were as a man, husband, and father. But, in order to afford all of these material goods and property, you had to be a successful breadwinner. Thus, consumerism and men's success fed into each other, especially with the rise of industrialization. (Katherine Hamilton) | To be a father and husband was to be a man, to be a father and husband was to be a breadwinner, and to be a breadwinner was to be a man. All of these identities were intertwined and so if a man lost his job he was not only no longer a breadwinner, but also no longer a successful father, husband, or man, he lost everything. On the other hand, the importance placed on breadwinning contributed to consumerism as the better your house, furniture, and other possessions, the more successful you were as a man, husband, and father. But, in order to afford all of these material goods and property, you had to be a successful breadwinner. Thus, consumerism and men's success fed into each other, especially with the rise of industrialization. (Katherine Hamilton) |
| | |
| | Due to increasing industrialization, most men now had jobs in which they worked for other people/businesses and did not own their own business. Therefore, they did not have a family business to pass down to their children nor did they have the skills of a trade to teach their sons so that they could go out and make their own business. Therefore, men were not spending their working hours at home teaching their sons technical skills but rather commuted to a secondary location to work away from their family. This resulted in children having distant relationships with their fathers as compared to pre industrialization. The father's role now was to be a provider, help with domestic chores if necessary, and offer advice, not teach tangible skills. (Katherine Hamilton) |
| |
| |
| |
| Johansen argues that fatherly love and obligation manifested itself in different ways in the 19th century than it does today. For example, instead of assuming that men's abition for economic success pulled them away from the family, it is argued that men actually saw earning money and supporting ther family as the obligation of the head of the house. Johansen also notes how it was important for fathers to be a good guide and example to their children, especially their sons, showing that they did, in fact, care for their children, it just showed itself differently than a mother's love at this time, or a father's love in modern times. -Caroline Cochran | Johansen argues that fatherly love and obligation manifested itself in different ways in the 19th century than it does today. For example, instead of assuming that men's abition for economic success pulled them away from the family, it is argued that men actually saw earning money and supporting ther family as the obligation of the head of the house. Johansen also notes how it was important for fathers to be a good guide and example to their children, especially their sons, showing that they did, in fact, care for their children, it just showed itself differently than a mother's love at this time, or a father's love in modern times. -Caroline Cochran |
| | |
| | Despite common misconceptions, while men were deemed the head of the household and their main purpose was to be a provider, they did often help out with duties that were deemed that of a woman. Similarly, while housekeeping and child rearing was deemed a woman's main purpose she would sometimes help her husband with his business work. The chores that were considered for men or women differed over time sometimes with a once male dominated chore, for example shopping, becoming a female dominated chore. This suggests that although the separate spheres ideology was still a major determinant of people's lives, it was not as strict as we may have once thought and especially in times of necessity, men would help their wives in their duties and vice versa. (Katherine Hamilton) |
| | |
| ===== Parenting from afar: Realities of traveling and absent fathers ===== | ===== Parenting from afar: Realities of traveling and absent fathers ===== |
| |
